The Post On Sunday
When the Paris Criminal Court handed down a five-year jail term to former French President Nicolas Sarkozy on September 25, 2025, it marked not only the climax of a lengthy legal saga in France but also a reminder of Libya’s unresolved political turmoil. Sarkozy was convicted of criminal conspiracy linked to allegations that his 2007 presidential campaign was secretly financed by the regime of the late Libyan strongman, Muammar Qaddafi.
Although he was cleared of other charges, including embezzlement of Libyan funds, corruption, and illegal campaign financing, the conviction underscored the toxic legacy of Libya’s fractured politics and its entanglement with global powers. Sarkozy’s legal troubles are inextricably tied to Libya’s descent into chaos, a country that has struggled to rebuild its institutions since NATO’s 2011 intervention, which played a decisive role in Qaddafi’s ouster and death.
Nearly fifteen years after Qaddafi’s fall, Libya remains trapped in a cycle of division, weak governance, and foreign interference. Two rival administrations, one based in Tripoli and the other in Benghazi, continue to vie for control, each backed by militias and competing international sponsors. Attempts at reconciliation, including UN-led peace talks, have often faltered as local actors protect entrenched interests, while oil revenues, the backbone of the economy, are weaponized in the political struggle.
The irony of it all, funds that were once allegedly diverted to Sarkozy’s campaign were oil dollars siphoned from the Libyan people, whose daily reality is now defined by fuel shortages, currency depreciation, and a crumbling healthcare system. For ordinary Libyans, the Sarkozy ruling does little to change their plight, but it reopens wounds about how their country’s wealth was abused both at home and abroad.

Sarkozy’s France was a key architect of the NATO-led intervention in 2011, justifying it on humanitarian grounds. Yet in Libya, many saw it as an opportunistic move to settle scores and reposition France as a power broker in North Africa. The trial’s revelations, that Sarkozy’s political rise may have been greased by Qaddafi’s oil money, complicate that narrative.
For Libyans, the question lingers: was their country’s destruction partly driven by the need to erase inconvenient evidence of shady financial deals? Whether conspiracy theory or plausible suspicion, Sarkozy’s conviction fuels debate about the West’s selective commitment to democracy and justice in the region.
The deeper tragedy lies within Libya itself. The North African nation, once held together by Qaddafi’s iron grip, has since been fractured along tribal, regional, and ideological lines. Elections promised repeatedly have been postponed, with the last major attempt in December 2021 collapsing over disputes about eligibility and constitutional frameworks. The failure to hold a vote has only deepened mistrust among Libyans, reinforcing the perception that politics serves elites, not citizens.
Meanwhile, Libya’s vast oil wealth has become a curse rather than a blessing. Control over oil terminals is fiercely contested, often leading to blockades that paralyze the economy. Rival militias thrive in this vacuum, creating insecurity that ordinary Libyans endure daily. The lack of strong institutions means corruption flourishes unchecked, and the rule of law is fragile at best.
The Sarkozy ruling, therefore, does more than sentence a former French president. It holds up a mirror to the interconnected failures of European opportunism and Libyan misgovernance. It reminds the world that Libya’s instability is not solely the result of domestic missteps but also of external meddling that continues to this day.
Regional powers such as Egypt, Turkey, and the UAE, alongside global actors like Russia, all play a hand in Libya’s affairs, often pursuing influence through proxies rather than supporting a genuine national reconciliation. This has perpetuated a state of frozen conflict, leaving Libyans trapped in a perpetual transitional phase.
Sarkozy’s conviction may embolden further scrutiny of how Western leaders deal with authoritarian regimes for political gain. But for Libya, the urgent task remains building inclusive institutions and restoring legitimacy to the political process. Without genuine reforms, the country risks remaining a case study in how revolutions can collapse into chronic instability.
More Stories
2030 Agenda Splits ZANU PF Leadership
Bridging Communities and Investors, ZIM-ZAM Summit Seeks Energy Solutions for All
South Africa Minister Halts $350.000 Rhino Hunt Permits Amid Legal Battle