I Refused to Pay for Rotten Chickens

By Staff Reporter

What began as an ordinary dispute over spoiled chickens inside a supermarket in Marondera has exploded into a wider national conversation about power, political influence, entitlement and the culture of fear that many Zimbabweans say has quietly shaped business operations and public institutions for decades.

In a lengthy and emotionally charged Facebook post titled “Meeting and Working for Saviour Kasukuwere – Part 3: The Day I Refused to Bow Down,” businessman and former supermarket manager Mafukidze recounted an encounter involving senior political figures that has since triggered intense public debate across social media platforms.

The story, which many readers described as both courageous and revealing, painted a disturbing picture of how business decisions in Zimbabwe can allegedly become entangled with political power and personal influence.

For many commentators, the account also offered a rare glimpse into what they believe has contributed to the collapse of professionalism, accountability and ethical business conduct within sections of Zimbabwe’s corporate and public sectors.

According to Mafukidze, the incident unfolded after a delivery of pork and chickens supplied by a company linked to senior government official and ruling party politician Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri arrived at the supermarket where he was employed.

While the pork products were reportedly fresh and of good quality, Mafukidze said the chicken consignment was in an appalling condition.

More than 200 kilograms of chickens delivered in sealed bags had allegedly gone bad.

“The meat had discoloured, turned green in some places and was simply unfit for human consumption,” Mafukidze wrote.

The spoiled stock immediately created a dilemma.

As the manager responsible for protecting both customers and the business, Mafukidze said he refused to authorise payment for the chickens and instructed that the spoiled products be collected by the supplier.

What followed, according to his account, was an encounter that exposed the pressure ordinary workers can face when powerful political names become attached to commercial transactions.

Mafukidze said after receiving what he described as intimidation attempts from a driver allegedly invoking the minister’s name, he decided to contact Muchinguri directly.

To his surprise, she answered the call herself.

He explained that there was no dispute regarding the pork products and that payment for those goods could be processed immediately.

The issue, he stressed, was solely about the rotten chickens which could not legally or ethically be placed on supermarket shelves.

But what Mafukidze expected to become a professional business conversation allegedly took a dramatic turn.

According to his account, Muchinguri insisted that the only acceptable outcome was full payment.

When he continued insisting that spoiled meat could not be approved for sale, the conversation reportedly became emotional and confrontational.

“She said, ‘Urikuda kundidherera because ndirimunhukadzi, urikuda kukanganisa relationship yangu na Tyson iwe,’” Mafukidze recalled.

The accusation, he said, caught him completely off guard.

Rather than attacking her, Mafukidze maintained that he was actually protecting the business interests of the supermarket and its ownership by refusing to allow dangerous products onto shelves.

“My responsibility was to protect the supermarket, the customers and the reputation of the business. Selling rotten food was not only unethical, it was dangerous,” he wrote.

But by then, he said, the discussion had ceased to be about standards, food safety or professional ethics.

“It had become a one-way exchange,” he reflected.

Still, he refused to back down.

Mafukidze said he made it clear that while payment for the pork products would proceed, he would never sign off on rotten chickens regardless of who the supplier was.

His position, however, would soon place him under internal pressure.

Not long after the phone call, the supermarket’s site manager reportedly approached him seeking an explanation about how he had spoken to the minister.

The message that followed reflected what many Zimbabweans say has become a familiar reality when dealing with politically connected individuals.

“We are supposed to pay her,” the manager allegedly instructed.

Mafukidze said he was told that situations involving senior politicians had to be handled “carefully” because such individuals were sensitive and influential.

Yet even under pressure from his superiors, he said he refused to compromise.

“I would authorise payment for the pork and nothing else. I would not sign off on rotten chickens. Right was right and wrong was wrong,” he wrote.

The experience, he reflected, taught him an important lesson about proximity to power.

“You learn to respect authority, but you also lose the fear of authority. You begin to understand that powerful people are still human beings and sometimes they too can be wrong.”

But despite standing firm, Mafukidze admitted that fear soon crept in.

His anxiety intensified when he learned that businessman and former cabinet minister Saviour Kasukuwere, whom he referred to as “Chairman”, was travelling to Marondera that same week.

Convinced he was about to lose his job, Mafukidze said he spent hours preparing mentally for what he believed would be his dismissal.

Instead, the encounter unfolded very differently.

He described the dramatic arrival of Kasukuwere accompanied by businessman Philip Chiyangwa in a chauffeur-driven Rolls Royce Phantom at the supermarket entrance.

“The moment I heard he was arriving, my heart sank,” Mafukidze wrote.

As they toured the supermarket, Kasukuwere casually asked him about the issue involving Muchinguri.

Expecting confrontation, Mafukidze instead explained the matter exactly as it had happened, the spoiled chickens, the refusal to pay, and the concerns over customer safety.

To his surprise, Kasukuwere reportedly sided with him immediately.

“There was no shouting, no threats, no intimidation,” he wrote.

Instead, Mafukidze said Kasukuwere told him he had made the correct business decision and that any responsible businessperson would have acted similarly.

“At that moment an enormous weight lifted off my shoulders,” he reflected.

The incident, Mafukidze said, fundamentally changed his understanding of leadership.

“A good leader does not surround himself with people who always say yes. A good leader values people who are prepared to protect the institution even when it is uncomfortable to do so.”

Meanwhile, Chiyangwa reportedly turned the visit into what workers described as a morale-boosting exercise, purchasing large quantities of groceries and paying for lunch for every employee at the complex.

What Mafukidze feared would become the day he lost his job instead became the day he earned the trust of his employer.

Yet beyond the personal story, the social media reactions that followed exposed broader public frustrations regarding Zimbabwe’s political and economic culture.

Many Zimbabweans commenting beneath the post argued that the story reflected deeper patterns of alleged abuse of authority, political interference in business and institutional decay.

One commenter, Obert Maturuzha, shared his own encounter involving Muchinguri.

“Vakambondi jambisa onarebhoo,” he wrote, describing how he once assisted her during shopping only for her to leave without even acknowledging his efforts.

“Ndakasiiwa ndakamira ipapo ne trolley yangu ndichiona dust remota richingonyangarika pamwe chete ne dignity yangu,” he added bitterly.

Another commenter, Jonathan Maweto, linked the story to the struggles facing Zimbabwean retail businesses.

“Now I know why OK Zimbabwe lose business,” he commented.

Others suggested that similar practices may have contributed to the collapse of parastatals and public institutions.

“You are a very brave young man,” another user wrote. “That’s how most parastatals in Zimbabwe went bust. Those people dump their rotten things there and make money from unsellable stuff.”

Alexander Mashungu argued that the incident reflected a broader political culture.

“I don’t blame her that much, it’s culture in the party. Abuse of authority,” he commented.

He further suggested that if such pressure could allegedly occur over spoiled chickens in a supermarket, the implications for larger government tenders and procurement contracts could be far more serious.

The story has since evolved beyond a simple business dispute.

For many Zimbabweans, it has become a symbolic reflection of the tensions between professionalism and political influence, between ethical standards and patronage networks, and between ordinary workers trying to uphold principles in environments where power often determines outcomes.

It is also a reminder of the quiet moral dilemmas faced daily by managers, civil servants, accountants and ordinary employees who must constantly navigate systems where political proximity can sometimes appear more important than procedure, safety or accountability.

And perhaps most importantly, Mafukidze’s account has reopened uncomfortable national questions about how fear, influence and political entitlement may continue shaping Zimbabwe’s economic culture behind closed doors, often far away from public scrutiny.

About The Author